I kid you not -- that was a question on C's "Sexual Identity Across the Lifespan" exam. And I kind of went into a frenzy over Facebook on her status when I found out.
First of all, the question was NOT open-response -- no essay, no paragraph crammed into a too-small space. It was multiple choice. I mean, how can someone predetermine right and wrong answers to such an incredibly subjective question? Did you not think that this question was subjective?
Oh, but let's look at the options C's class was given ... As well as C could recall: (A) Yes, because their parents have hope that they may become straight. (B) Yes, because of reactions and stereotypes. (C) No, because their parents have hope that they may still become straight. (D) No, because of reactions and stereotypes.
I have a few discrepancies with these answers.
Showing posts with label c. Show all posts
Showing posts with label c. Show all posts
3.27.2012
2.09.2012
"Why did you apply to be the LGBTQA Connection Associate?"
I thought this would be a good question to start with.
My lesser reasons include wanting to be more involved on the Ursinus campus and needing a job. How lucky was I to find something that I would love and be paid to do, amiright? I also wanted a job that would be a challenge -- not at all like my two glamorous years at Burger King or my current profession of counting things. (I'm an "inventory associate;" it's awesome.)
The remainder of my reasoning is more involved.
My lesser reasons include wanting to be more involved on the Ursinus campus and needing a job. How lucky was I to find something that I would love and be paid to do, amiright? I also wanted a job that would be a challenge -- not at all like my two glamorous years at Burger King or my current profession of counting things. (I'm an "inventory associate;" it's awesome.)
The remainder of my reasoning is more involved.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)